Robert Mueller's IV. CONCLUSION with additional questions about presenting

I. My conclusion: As I read, the use of extra spacing after periods rang a bell that we are not in the present. Contemporary style requires only a brief, single space. —Alonna Shaw

Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct.#what exists between double spaces?#The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment.#why this long pause?#At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state.#what exists between extra hot air?#Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment.#why do readers accept outdated reading as present conditions?#Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.#conclusion?#


II. My process: I question the past (punctuation) rules within double spaces.

III. About space exploration: Get nearer to the point with one. Consult Chapter 6.7 of CMOS (17th ed.).